Does ABA Work? We’re Asking the Wrong Question.

a creepy therapist is coercing a child's hand to touch an object. the child looks at her with a sense of existential dread, shame, and something akin to giving up on life.

The first thing my child’s doctor handed me on the day of his diagnosis was a referral for applied behavioral analysis (ABA). He told me it was the standard treatment for autism, and we should get started right away.

I already had a vague idea of what ABA was, but I decided to research it for myself when I got home. A quick Google search turned up articles touting ABA as the most effective treatment for autism.

“ABA helps children gain new skills and build meaningful relationships. It’s the only treatment for autism backed by decades of research.”

It all seemed pretty damn necessary if I ever wanted my kid to learn things and make friends at school. I mean the doctor said he needed it because he has autism, and I wouldn’t want to hold him back from reaching his full potential, right?

As a general rule, I stay away from the ABA battlefield.  For every criticism against the intervention, there’s a counter argument in favor of it. The two camps have become so polarized that conversations have grinded to a halt – leaving new parents to figure it out on their own. 

But I do have thoughts, and I’ll share them with you now. Just don’t tell anyone they came from me.

So, What is ABA?

If you’re already familiar, you can skip this section. If not, hold my beer as I run through a grossly compressed history of how this treatment was developed and the principles on which it was founded.

(You can find links to more comprehensive resources at the bottom of this article.)

  • Behavioral psychology was born from studying animals. It’s based on the theory that all behaviors are learned through our interactions with the environment, otherwise known as conditioning. A rat will touch a button if it gives out food. It will stop touching a button if it gets shocked.

    Behaviorism only looks at observable behavior which can be measured. It doesn’t take into account thoughts, genetics, anxiety, trauma, health, or emotions because those things cannot be measured. 
  • Applied behavioral analysis (ABA) marketed as a therapy for autistic children, is an intensive, long-term intervention program pioneered in the 1960’s by Ole Ivar Lovaas. It uses the principles of behavioral psychology to observe, predict, and condition behaviors in autistic children.

    Researchers at the time performed discrete trials (experiments) on autistic children ranging from long-term seclusion to electrocution.
  • The behavior modification techniques Lovaas developed were highly successful in extinguishing undesirable behaviors, hence the decades-long proven research. For instance to stop a child from flapping his hands, researchers might introduce a loud, scary noise each time he started. 
  • These methods also proved effective at training children to perform more appropriate behaviors. Treats, praise, and repetition were used to reinforce skills such as hugging a caregiver or giving eye contact.

    If a child did the required task, he would get a reward. These tasks – sitting at a table and working on a puzzle for example – were repeated day after day after day until the child would do it without prompting.
  • Those in favor of ABA as a treatment option for autism hold tight to the efficacy of those studies and claim that the old methods of punishment are long-gone from the field. It’s now much gentler, and strictly rewards-based.

    Those who oppose ABA challenge the validity of any study involving the intervention, and cite the 2020 Supreme Court’s ruling ordering the Judge Rotenberg Center in Massachusetts to temporarily cease the use of electroshock as punishment as proof that it is not gentler.

My Thoughts on ABA:
Part One

We’re Asking the Wrong Questions.

To me the question isn’t, Does behaviorism work? Behaviorism absolutely works. We use it everyday without giving it a second thought. Think of those long car rides we take while the kids sit in the back asking, Are we there yet?

Instead of reaching back and choking the shit out of them, we ignore them until they stop asking. After a while without a response, they move on to some other annoying activity. That is behaviorism at work – planned ignoring to be more precise.

The more important question we should ask ourselves is, What’s the cost?

Autism isn’t a behavioral diagnosis. It’s a neurological and developmental diagnosis. It frequently manifests as observable behaviors, but the root causes for those behaviors originate from within autistic people’s nervous and sensory systems.

Behavioral psychology – the guiding theory behind ABA – isn’t concerned with those causes because they aren’t measurable.

In fact, our children’s neurology, sensory differences, emotions, past trauma, co-occuring conditions, and stress load – are all irrelevant. ABA technicians can’t collect data on feelings, so feelings are left out of the practice altogether.

A personal anecdote ~

I witnessed the efficacy of planned ignoring first-hand when my twins were in the NICU. Babies are born with the instinct to cry when they’re hungry. When my boys were about two weeks old, they developed a dangerous intestinal infection.

The doctors immediately stopped feeding them and inserted a picc line into their heart to disperse the nutrition they needed. While their bodies technically had enough nourishment, their bellies were empty. So they cried. 

I wasn’t allowed to hold or comfort them because their condition was too critical. Day after day, we ignored their cries for their own good. It lasted for weeks. And you know what happened?

They eventually stopped crying. They gave up on their basic human survival instincts because they didn’t prove effective.

The same is true for children in ABA environments. Yes, I’m referring to modern home and center-based environments as well. Hell, many of these clinics are located at our country’s leading research hospitals and labeled Autism Centers for Excellence.

Parents with the best intentions hand their children over to these centers, even when their parental instincts tell them it isn’t right – because their doctor told them it’s their child’s only hope for improvement.  

For eight hours per day, our vulnerable young children are expected to comply with demands and perform on cue – regardless of their sensory differences, emotional state, sense of security, or trauma histories.

Their “unpreferred behaviors” are ignored while their assigned technician withholds positive reinforcements – including a friendly smile – for eight hours per day, day after day.

At first the children might resist, trusting their own instincts for safety and security. They might cry, kick, or scream.

When the parents become concerned, the program directors assure them that this reaction is to be expected. The adjustment can be hard at first, but to trust in the process (not their parental instincts) because the child’s behaviors will eventually subside.  

And they’re right. Eventually the protests do subside. Just like my infants in the NICU, our autistic children eventually learn that nobody is coming to help them.

Their parents, the sole humans on this earth invested in their well-being, bring them to this place and abandon them day after day, no matter how fiercely they protest.  So yes, they eventually get with the program.

That’s because eventually, they break. 

It’s our job as parents to protect our children from physical and emotional harm, to shield them from abuse, to defend them against anyone who might cause them harm. It’s not just our job, it’s one of our strongest biological instincts.

But for some reason we abdicate that duty as soon as our children receive an autism diagnosis – and we don’t even know why. We abandon our principles, our confidence, our competence. We surrender our children’s well-being to strangers who wear white coats, and that’s something we seriously need to examine.

Part Two of this series will go over the key strategies used in ABA, how those strategies might affect a child’s mental and emotional health, and how to identify those strategies in circumstances we don’t expect to find them being used.

Helpful links for now:

Invisible Abuse: ABA and Only the Things Autistic People Can See by C.L. Lynch

If Not ABA, Then What? by Maxfield Sparrow

My Thoughts on ABA by Amy Sequenzia

I Worked at an ABA Clinic. It Was Abuse. ~Neuroclastic

Book Recommendations for now:

The Reason I Jump by Naoki Higashida

Beyond Behaviors by Dr. Mona Delahooke

NeuroTribes by Steve Silberman

Related Articles

11 Responses

  1. When my daughter’s clinician at the local MH center found out that my daughter is Autistic — the FIRST thing she recommended was ABA. When I told her than many #actuallyautistic adults consider it abusive, she genuinely seemed shocked. (BTW, my child is 11, verbal, and also ADHD) I told the therapist that we would not be doing ABA, and she has not brought it up again

    We NEED to get the information out to the GENERAL PUBLIC by making sure that the main “advocacy group” for Autism isn’t the main one anymore.

  2. This was so extremely well-written. I laughed, I cried, I shouted “PREACH!” Thank you for sharing this – such a helpful resource for us as we engage with our loved ones about why we are not doing ABA.

  3. This has been used in some children for autism. If your child had ECT there are no time constraints to file suit. Here is a link for family members of loved ones that have had the procedure called ECT/electroshock. It will tell you of tests and resources available along with five other videos for information. Learn about the lawsuits taking place around damages both in the US and now in England. We hope once you have the information that you will share how you can, we can bring additional types of suits to benefit your loved ones moving forward. We need a bright light shown on this issue that leads quite a few to suicide following. This is not just for depression nor used as a last resort. Electrical trauma has both long and short-term outcomes patients are not warned of. There is no FDA testing for safety or even effectiveness. CA courts have now proved brain injury. Brain injury programs recognize electrical trauma for TBI outcomes but will not address these outcomes around ECT use as it will implicate providers and facilities. See six videos under heading (ds electroshock) See Here is the link to assist you:

  4. Fact check. Read the Behavior Analysis Board Certification handbook. Look at RECENT scientific articles. Not only is some of her information incorrect or outdated, but when called out on falsehoods/given facts that go against her opinion she deletes the comments on her Facebook page and mutes anybody trying to give some truth. ABA may not be for everybody, but if you’re really trying to educate you’d take accurate facts from both sides and not block truthful information.

    1. You Austyn are creating a falsehood by saying their IS two sides.
      Historical data remains relevant, and regardless of the date of the article, ANY Autism research that is not Autistically informed results in misinterpretations of the data, and harmful recommendations that don’t impact anyone other than the Autistic community that then has to suffer at the hands of the NT Autism research cycle.
      The Autistic side is the only one that matters. It is being to US, without consent, and the “results” speak for themselves (as do the Autistics who experience it). Sit down.

    2. Late comment but in comments like these I always wonder “whose truth?” The providers? The researchers? Or the Autistic individuals lived experiences of the intervention? And which one are commenters implying should receive the most value?

      At the end of 2021, I sat in on an ABA home service visit where I observed an RBT withhold sensory play (the child’s preferred play activity) until the child complied. This was per the BCBA’s instructions. The outcome for this child was trauma that resulted in SIB’s and and skill regression of significant progress the child had made in early intervention.

      This went on for months until we finally convinced the parent to switch clinics. (She was and still is deathly afraid of giving up ABA) The new clinic is only “better” in that they took the time to build trust with the child before using compliance and never withhold his favorites, per moms explicit request.

      I am sure many hold the profession in high regard and I recognize there are some extraordinary people in it. I have even met some Autistic BCBA’s who are working to change the field from the inside. However, that doesn’t mean ABA as a whole has improved and isn’t still causing immense harm to a lot of Autistic individuals.

Talk to us... what are you thinking?

Skip to content
%d bloggers like this: